"So you are the only supplier of this product; you are differentiated from your rivals, with huge barriers to entry. In addition, you have the lowest costs due to your economies of scale. Furthermore, you are able to successfully convince consumers that you are the best at making this product, and your brand reputation is second to none. In other words, you hold a monopoly in this market, which must be generating millions for you, correct??
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
"Wrong!, Despite being the only supplier of chocoloate teapots we can't seem to turn s profit, why not?"
"Ok, let's get serious."
↓
↓
↓
↓
"In the last unit we used the surveys below to reveal the 'features' of the most competitive market, but at the same time it also revealed the features of the least competitive, namely the 'MRT'.", "Have a try at finishing this sentence: "The market for mass rapid transport in Hong Kong can be considered a monopoly because..."
MONOPOLY refers to a MARKET STRUCTURE, in which an individual firm has SIGNIFICANT PRICE SETTING ABILITY and hence has a relatively INELASTIC DOWNWARD SLOPING DEMAND CURVE.
--A SINGLE DOMINANT FIRM--
"In contrast to the drivers in the very competitive hail-ride-sharing market, the monopoly's output constitutes a significant portion of the total market supply; hence, by reducing or increasing their own production, they can directly influence the market price, and in cases when one firm supplies the entire market (like the 'MRT in Hong Kong'), we can say that the monopoly's supply curve is also the industry's supply curve."
↓
↓
↓
↓
--REAL-WORLD EXAMPLE--
"In 1973-74, OPEC members halted exports to the U.S. and several allies in response to Western support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War. This resulted in oil prices quadrupling, creating shortages, and rapid inflation."
--NO CLOSE SUBSTITUTES--
"In contrast to the drivers in the very competitive hail-ride-sharing market, who each produce almost identical services, the monopoly has little to no close substitutes and therefore, in the case where it provides a necessity, has inelastic demand, giving them tremendous market power.
"How to stop them exploiting this competitive advantage?"
--HIGH BARRIERS TO ENTRY--
"In contrast to the drivers in the very competitive hail-ride-sharing market, in which the very low entry barriers meant that in the LR new entrants could easily enter and 'compete away' any abnormal profits, in the monopoly model the very high barriers prevent this entry, allowing them to keep these abnormal profits way into the future."
↓
↓
↓
↓
--BARRIERS TO ENTRY/EXIT--
--ECONOMIES OF SCALE--
ECONOMIES OF SCALE refer to AVERAGE COST REDUCTIONS THAT OCCUR WHEN A FIRM INCREASES ITS SCALE OF PRODUCTION.
"How are these a barrier to entry?"
New entrants will naturally be lower scale as well as face huge start-up costs that probably involve a lot of debt repayments; as such, they will not only have higher average costs but also lack the ability to lower prices in a 'price war' with an existing established player.
"Anyone remember virgin cola?"
↓
↓
↓
--REAL-WORLD EXAMPLE--
"The small guy ain't got a chance, just ask Richard Branson!"
--BRANDING--
BRANDING involves the creation by a firm of a UNIQUE IMAGE & NAME of a product. It works through ADVERTISING campaigns that try to influence consumer tastes in favour of the product, attempting to ESTABLISH CUSTOMER LOYALTY.
"How are these a barrier to entry?"
If branding of a product is successful, many consumers will be convinced of the product’s superiority and will be unwilling to switch to substitute products, even though these may be qualitatively very similar. Examples of branding include brand-name items (such as NIKE®, Adidas®, CocaCola®, etc.)
"Watch this video to show the power of the tech superbrands!"
"Branding can also lead to loss of power!"
--LEGAL BARRIERS--
"PATENTS are rights given by the government to a firm that has developed a new product or invention to be its sole producer for a specified period of time. For that period, the firm producing the patented product has a monopoly on the product."
LICENSES are granted by governments for particular professions or particular industries. Licences may be required, for example, to operate radio or television stations, or to enter a particular profession (such as medicine, dentistry, architecture, law and others). Such licences do not usually result in a monopoly, but they do have the impact of limiting competition.
COPYRIGHTS guarantee that an author (or an author’s appointed person) has the sole rights to print, publish and sell copyrighted works.
PUBLIC FRANCHISES are granted by the government to a firm which is to produce or supply a particular good or service.
TARIFFS, QUOTAS & OTHER TRADE RESTRICTIONS limit the quantities of a good that can be imported into a country, thus reducing competition.
--CONTROL OF ESSENTIAL RESOURCE--
Clearly, if you are the only owner/controller of the resource then you immediately have large market power, particularly if the good is in-demand and has no close substitutes.
↓
↓
↓
"...and with a downward sloping demand curve, the profit maximising price is found via the AR-curve."
↓
↓
↓
"Again, just like in PC, there are 3 states of profitability in the SR for a monopolist, namely, earning abnormal profits, normal profits, or making a loss, which are illustrated below."
↓
↓
↓
--THINK AHEAD--
"Do you remember what happened to the perfectly competitive firm that was making economic profit in the SR?" "What do you think would happen in the long run when a monopolist is making economic profits in the SR?"
↓
↓
↓
↓
"That's right!, in PC the very low barriers meant rivals entered and 'competed away' the profits, however as we know in a monopoly the barriers to entry are so high they are able to mainitain these profits well into the future, hence the SR and LR diagrams are identical."
↓
"It sounds like a silly question as we all agree that 'competition' is very desirable, as it keeps prices low and leads to more efficient outcomes...right?" "Let's now compare the two in terms of prices, output,
↓
"If we return to the hail-ride market example and imagine that all the cars were owned and operated by a single firm, then the industry supply curve would become the monopolist's supply curve giving them market power and the ability to set their price using the markets MR curve."
"Now if we put the PC and Monopoly diagrams together we can clearly see the relative price and output outcomes, with the monopolist's price being higher and its output lower than the PC market's."
"...in terms of 'allocative efficiency' the fact that the monopoly is producing below the socially optimal level in both the SR and the LR implies it is an example of a market failure creating a welfare loss (unlike the firm in PC which is always efficient)."
"So far it's really not looking good for the monopolist is it?", 'Higher prices' and 'inefficient output', why on earth would we ever want a monopoly to exist!" "Can you think of any benefits of having say a 'Walmart' in your town?"
↓
↓
↓
"Did you say lower prices and greater quantity?", "Didn't we just say they have the oppositie?, I'm confused."
↓
↓
ABLE TO FINANCE LARGE R&D as they earn from abnormal profits in the LR.
INCENTIVE TO INNOVATE as they can keep large profits and maintain long-term competitive barriers.
ECONOMIES OF SCALE mean that lower average costs could be passed to consumers in the form of LOWER PRICES and GREATER OUTPUT compared to perfect competition.
Allocative inefficiency
Loss of consumer surplus
Loss of producer surplus
DWL
PAPER 1 10-MARKERS
Explain two possible government responses to the abuse of monopoly power.
Explain why monopoly power may be considered a type of market failure
Explain how welfare loss might result from monopoly power.
PAPER 1 15-MARKERS
WWW.EDULASTIC.COM