--THINK AHEAD--
"The video below is an animated version of the essay titled 'I, Pencil: My Family Tree' by Leonard Read, (1958), let's watch it and see if you can infer the definition of 'Globalisation'",
HINT: It's related to the work 'Interdependance'.
GLOBALISATION refers to the PROCESS by which the WORLD IS BECOMING ONE INTEGRATED AND INTERDEPENDENT MARKETPLACE.
In other words, trade in goods, services, and resources is becoming BORDERLESS and WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS.
--THINK AHEAD--
My last purchase on Taobao was for a pair of Minecraft slippers, which cost a total of $5 after tax and with shipping, but how was it possible to get this shipped from Beijing to Hong Kong (approx. 2000 km) so cheaply?" "How is it that I knew this product even existed in the first place?", "What type of trade relationship does China and Hong Kong have?".
"Surely it will cost thousands of dollars to get something delivered from the other side of the world, right?"
"Not anymore; thanks to 'CONTAINERIZATION,' the average price of transportation has fallen dramatically, as containers enable much more to be carried on ships, trains, and planes, lowering average transportation costs for the consumers."
"How is it even possible that someone in HK knows that a K-Pop Demon Hunter wristwatch is for sale in China?"
"...It's possible because, thanks to 'ADVANCES IN COMMUNICATION' like the internet, we are able to find, browse, and purchase goods online from anywhere on the planet. Also, online banking has made it super simple to pay online."
"Hang on, don't we need to pay a tax to sell our goods and/or services in other countries?"
"...the answer is 'yes'; most countries use some form of protectionist policy, such as a tariff (tax on imports), to help 'protect' domestic producers from foreign competitors. However, the CREATION OF MORE AND MORE FREE-TRADE ZONES means these 'barriers to trade' such as tariffs are gradually being reduced or removed, which ultimately lowers the price of exports, making them more attractive to buy."
Apply the above-mentioned '3 causes of globalisation' to your latest 'non-domestic' purchase, explaining why despite being in HK you found it 'hassle-free' to buy 'Made overseas,' rather than 'Made in HK'.
Write in your books as well as add it to the padlet below.
A MULTINATIONAL COMPANY (MNC) is a business organisation that PRODUCES IN MORE THAN ONE COUNTRY. The country that it originates from is referred to as the 'HOME COUNTRY' while the others that it operates in are called 'HOST COUNTRIES'.
Producing in countries where their products are sold rather than exporting to those countries will REDUCE THE MNCs’ TRANSPORTATION COSTS.
Being close to their customer base will enable them to keep in RESPOND QUICKLY TO ANY CHANGES IN TASTES & PREFERENCES.
Producing in countries where their products are sold will enable them to AVOID RESTRICTIONS ON IMPORTS, such as TARIFFS and QUOTAS.
Producing in countries where LABOUR and RAW MATERIALS are CHEAPER will allow them to HAVE LOWER COSTS.
They may also RECEIVE GRANTS from the governments of the countries in which they set up as they are in high demand.
"Read the headline below and write a letter from Elon Musk to his TESLA shareholders, outlining the benefits that they will reap from setting up production facilities in India. In your answer, mention all 5 benefits listed above in context."
"Discuss the view that allowing an MNC to open operation in your country is beneficial to the economy (8)"
INCREASE EMPLOYMENT, OUTPUT, GDP and TAX REVENUE, which can be used to IMPROVE THE PROVISION OF MERIT GOODS, such as EDUCATION & HEALTHCARE
Bring in NEW TECH and management ideas, which can in turn be used by domestic firms to DEVELOP THEIR OWN INDUSTRIAL BASE and DIVERSIFY into new SUNRISE INDUSTRIES themselves.
As a condition of being allowed to invest the MNC must DEVELOP and BUILD NEW INFRASTRUCTURE. which can be utilised by all domestic industries, such as new airports and road and rail networks as well as schools and hospitals.
POLLUTE: They may, however, be more prone to pollute and willing to close down plants in foreign countries.
EMPLOY OWN STAFF: Local job opportunities will be limited as the MNC will bring its own staff instead.
TOO MUCH INFLUENCE: Their size and their ability to shift production may mean that they can put pressure on the governments of the host countries in which they have plants, to give them tax concessions and not to penalise them for poor safety standards.
DRIVE LOCAL FIRMS OUT OF BUSINESS: In addition, although MNCs may increase employment, there is a risk that they may drive domestic firms out of business
REPATRIATION OF PROFITS: The profits they earn may be sent overseas to shareholders in their home countries rather than being reinvested in the host country.
READ the following parliamentary speech by Prime minister Modi exclaiming the merits to India of the proposed building of a TESLA production plant. COPY & PASTE it into your google doc and HIGHLIGHT/UNDERLINE all the BENEFITS that you can find and EXTRACT them into a LIST:
"The potential establishment of a Tesla production facility in India presents a transformative opportunity for our nation's economy. One of the most immediate benefits would be the significant increase in employment opportunities. This endeavor would create a multitude of jobs across various skill levels, ranging from assembly line workers to engineers, thereby reducing unemployment and enhancing the livelihoods of our citizens. Furthermore, the operation of a Tesla facility would substantially boost industrial output, contributing to the growth of our gross domestic product (GDP). This increased economic activity would not only elevate India's standing on the global stage but also foster inclusive growth by creating a ripple effect of economic prosperity. Moreover, the tax revenue generated from Tesla's operations would serve as a vital source of funding for improving the provision of merit goods such as education and healthcare. These funds can be channeled towards enhancing access to quality education and healthcare services for all our citizens, thereby promoting human capital development and ensuring a healthier, more educated workforce. The introduction of Tesla's cutting-edge technologies and innovative management ideas would catalyze a wave of technological advancement across various industries in India. Domestic firms would have the opportunity to learn from Tesla's expertise and incorporate these advancements into their own operations, thereby strengthening our industrial base and diversifying into new sunrise industries. Finally, as a condition of investment, Tesla would be required to develop and build new infrastructure that benefits not only their operations but also the broader domestic industries. This could include the construction of new airports, road and rail networks, as well as schools and hospitals. By investing in such critical infrastructure, Tesla would contribute to the overall development of our nation, facilitating smoother transportation and providing essential social services to our citizens"
Now imagine that you are opposing the investment by TESLA, and you need to find some counterarguments for the points highlighted by PM Modi in task 1. as well as Make a any others you can think about drawing on the 'NEGATIVE' dropdown above.
FREE TRADE occurs when there are NO RESTRICTIONS on the products bought by firms and consumers from abroad or products sold by firms to other countries and no imposition of special taxes called 'TARIFFS'.
--THINK AHEAD--
"In this video a Cuban visits Costco for the first time. Can you think why he reacts the way he does?"
"Below is a picture of a street in Havana, the capital city of Cuba, what year do you think it was taken in?"
"In the 1960s, the US imposed a 'trade embargo,' banning all trade between them (a huge trade partner) and Cuba.
"Do you remember this movie, about a person who has to survive alone on an island?", "Do you think he has the option to specialise in making sure he has access to clean drinking water?" "Why/Why not?" "Could he depend on anyone else?"
"No!, clearly NOT, ' trade is not an option, so specialisation is also not an option; however, when we look at whole economies, we can see the opposite. For them, 'trade is an option'; as such, they all 'specialise' and thus 'depend heavily on others.'
"....look at how much Hong Kong is dependent on trade with China. We could say that 'trade allows countries to specialise, and the freer the trade, the greater the level of national specialistaion and all the related benefits'"
"Did you know that prior to the 2019 pro-democracy protests, the HK police had only once before deployed the use of water cannons, and it was during the 'Siege of Wan Chai' in 2016, when South Korean farmers protested about the 'removal of trade barriers'", "Can you think of why they were so angry?"
"...The reason is they were upset that the removal of the barriers would mean increased domestic competition, forcing some to either improve efficiency or leave the industry."
"Why do you think a Hong Kong-based maker of MANGO desserts can sell them at such a 'reasonable' price?"
"That's right! Due to national specialization and freer trade, IMPORTED INTERMEDIATE GOODS that are produced more efficiently in other countries (like mangoes from India) can be imported, which leads to LOWER COSTS OF PRODUCTION for domestic producers, which they pass on to the consumer in the form of LOWER PRICES."
"Why do you think that the richest companies in the world are all MNCs?"
With trade, firms now have ACCESS TO A MUCH LARGER CUSTOMER BASE, which means they can POTENTIALLY MAKE MUCH LARGER SALES AND PROFITS, especially if their domestic market is small or already saturated.
We can see below Walmart's global presence.
"Do you think TESLA would have expanded its 'scale' and built its 'Gigafactory' if it didn't have access to larger markets?"
The possibility of trade and exports to other countries involves an EXPANSION IN THE SIZE OF THE MARKET, allowing firms to produce more output, ACHIEVE ECONOMIES OF SCALE, and enjoy the benefits of LOWER AVERAGE COSTS, which include LOWER PRICES and therefore GREATER EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS, or the ability to compete better in foreign markets.
"Singapore: A First-World Country That Buys Its Water from Malaysia?”
Countries may NEED A NUMBER OF NATURAL RESOURCES OR CAPITAL GOODS that are NOT AVAILABLE DOMESTICALLY. Trade allows countries to import inputs they need for domestic production.
"When you buy something on Amazon, the seller wants USD, and to get that USD, you need to exchange something with them they want, without this opportunity you can't buy it"
Whenever countries sell goods and services to other countries, they ACQUIRE FOREIGN EXCHANGE (FOREX), which allows them to make payments to other countries for the goods and services they import, or make other payments abroad.
"Now it's time that we had a very important chat about life, and 'methods of protection,' I bet you didn't think you would be in an economics class.
PROTECTIONISM is the shielding of the country’s industries from the competition posed by other countries’ industries and hence involves restriction of free trade.
"Hey, Chiiiiiiiina! We charge you a 34% tariff on your imports to the US, but you charge us 67% on our imports to you, not fair!"
TARIFFS, are TAXES ON IMPORTED GOODS, which raise the price of imports, making them less competitive.
"But why charge tariffs?"
Well, higher import prices mean consumers will buy the cheaper, domestic substitute and thus 'PROTECT' them from foreign competition.
Also, the government will earn extra tax revenue called a REVENUE TARIFF, which it can use to pay for merit goods or buy importan imports.
"Let's limit the 'QUANTITY' of imports!"
QUOTAS are PHYSICAL LIMITS ON THE QUANTITY OF IMPORTED GOODS, which is again a form of 'PROTECTIONISM,' as there are fewer imports for domestic firms to compete against.
"How (why is obvious) do you think the US makes sure it never relies on imports for its fuel?"
"Let me help you lower your costs so you can be more competitive with those pesky imports!"
PRODUCTION SUBSIDIES are PAYMENTS GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT PER UNIT OF OUTPUT SOLD DOMESTICALLY which allows them TO LOWER THEIR UNIT COST so they are MORE COMPETITIVE when COMPETING with IMPORTS within the DOMESTIC MARKET.
EMBARGOES are government BANS ('SANCTIONS') ON THE DOMESTIC IMPORTATION OR EXPORT OF CERTAIN (ALL) GOODS and SERVICES, to ANOTHER STATE.
For example currently the has trade sanctions in place targeting Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria, and certain conflict regions of Ukraine.
An INFANT INDUSTRY is a NEW DOMESTIC INDUSTRY that has not had time to establish itself and achieve efficiencies in production, and therefore CAN'T COMPETE WITH THE ALREADY WELL-ESTABLISHED COMPETITORS FROM ABROAD WHICH HAVE MUCH LOWER COSTS due to ECONOMIES OF SCALE.
Therefore, for the infant industry to stand a chance it must also achieve economies of scale and so in the mean time NEEDS PROTECTION FROM IMPORTS until it grows to a size where protection is no longer needed.
Certain industries are essential for NATIONAL SECURITY such as AIRCRAFT, WEAPONS, CHEMICALS, and of course the RAW MATERIALS to build them, and more recently issues regarding FOOD SECURITY have raised concerns about self-sustainability in times of global shocks such as COVID and the UKRAINE-RUSSIA CONFLICT, hence protectionism is needed so that a country can produce these necessities itself.
In times of war or a national emergency, a country should not have to depend on imports for its defence. Moreover, there may be dangers in having ‘unfriendly’ nations specialise in weapons production.
DUMPING refers to the practice of SELLING A GOOD IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETS AT AN ARTIFICIALLY LOW PRICE, due to HELP FROM GOVERNMNET EXPORT SUBSIDIES.
Dumping is considered to be an UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE, and is ILLEGAL according to the WTO, therefor, if a country suspects that a trading partner is practising dumping, it should have the right to impose tariffs or quotas in order to limit imports of the subsidised, or dumped good.
According to this argument, restrictions on imports are needed to protect domestic employment. Import restrictions cause consumers to shift consumption away from imports and towards goods produced domestically. As domestic production increases, unemployment falls, since firms need to hire more labour in order to increase their supply of goods.
LIMITATIONS:-
The problem with this argument is that if unemployment in the domestic economy falls due to import restrictions, this means that unemployment increases in the countries that are forced to export less. The foreign countries that are hurt may retaliate by imposing import restrictions of their own, which will create unemployment in the domestic country's export industries.
--NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES--
DOMESTIC CONSUMERS:
HIGHER PRICES: When the tariffs, quotas, etc are imposed the price of all imported goods will rise, meaning that domestic consumers will have to pay more for these goods or switch to slightly cheaper domestic products, either way, they will be spending more. on these goods than before Alternatively, they will just have to go without.
LESS CHOICE: As the prices of imports go up, many of the importers may decide not to sell in the country and this will reduce the choices available to consumers
DOMESTIC PRODUCERS OF IMPORTED INPUTS: Domestically produced goods that use imported raw materials will see their costs of production rise, which means they will have to raise their prices, which makes them less competitive both domestically and internationally (if they are exporters) and this will lower the quantity demanded.
RETALIATION MAY OCCUR: The governments of those countries whose firms are being protected against, may RETALIATE, by imposing barriers of their own which will reduce the quantity demanded of domestic producers.
DOMESTIC UNEMPLOYMENT MAY RISE: The combination of higher raw material prices, and retaliation will both result in lower demand and therefore increase domestic unemployment.
INEFFICIENCY INCREASES: In terms of allocative efficiency, the protectionism has resulted in MORE OUTPUT being produced by inefficient, high-cost domestic producers, at the expense of output from the more efficient lower-cost foreign producers, therefore resulting in a misallocation of resources.
++POSITIVE CONSEQUENCES++
SEE 'REASONS FOR PROTECTION' ABOVE
HIGHER PRICES: When the tariffs, quotas, etc are imposed the price of all imported goods will rise, meaning that domestic consumers will have to pay more for these goods or switch to slightly cheaper domestic products, either way, they will be spending more. on these goods than before Alternatively, they will just have to go without.
LESS CHOICE: As the prices of imports go up, many of the importers may decide not to sell in the country and this will reduce the choices available to consumers.
DOMESTIC PRODUCERS USING IMPORTED INPUTS: Domestically produced goods that use imported raw materials will see their costs of production rise, which means they will have to raise their prices, which makes them less competitive both domestically and internationally (if they are exporters) and this will lower the quantity demanded.
DOMESTIC UNEMPLOYMENT MAY RISE: As domestic exporting firms that use imported raw materials become uncompetitive on the world market, as well as the fact that the governments of those countries whose firms are being protected against, may RETALIATE, by imposing barriers of their own which will reduce the quantity demanded of domestic export producers, the likelihood of jobs being lost and domestic unemployment rising is high.
TARIFF REVENUE WILL INCREASE: In the case of tariffs the government will receive these funds and can use them to fund merit good provision such as HEALTHCARE and EDUCATION services, however as mentioned if the protectionism results in greater unemployment then the government will need to spend more of these funds on welfare programmes such as unemployment benefits, thus countering any gains.
INEFFICIENCY INCREASES: The idea of INTERNATIONAL SPECIALISATION is based on the premise that countries will specialise in the production of the good or service that they can make at the lowest relative cost, which results in the most productive nation specialising and trading their surplus, however protectionism will often result in MORE OUTPUT BEING PRODUCED BY INEFFICIENT, HIGH-COST DOMESTIC PRODUCERS AT THE EXPENSE OF OUTPUT FROM THE MORE EFFICIENCT LOW COST FOREIGN PRODUCERS, therefore resulting in a misallocation of global resources.
Discuss whether a reduction in a country’s trade protection will improve its economic performance.
Discuss whether an economy would benefit from an MNC setting up
Discuss whether a country’s economy would be harmed if an MNC moved out.
Discuss whether consumers would benefit from an increase in imports.
Discuss whether or not a developing country will benefit from the removal of trade restrictions.
Discuss whether or not MNCs are likely to set up in countries with low unemployment